Spider-man 4 Not gonna happen

[therapist]

http://www.comicvine.com/news/spider-ma ... ad/140163/



For those of you who can't fallow the link well it says Spider-man 4 has ben cancelled instead we get a reboot. How does everyone feel about this ? I personally really enjoyed Spider-Man 1, two & 3 however... Not so much.

[Punstarr]

I have no opinion about this.

Now a FF reboot would be all kinds of awesome.

[Green Skin]

It be cool if they stopped the Spiderman movies for awhile and focused on other characters. A trilogy is enough, lets see a decent Daredevil, or Ray Parks in an Iron Fist movie.

[leafman343]

while I agree that doing a reboot is kinda silly since the last spider-man movie isn't very old, I would like to see someone other than Tobey Mcguire as Peter Parker. Mcquire's Parker was whiney little pansy, he didn't have any good quips and he always looked like he was about to cry, Tofer Grace (Venom in Spidey-3) would have been a better choice.

As a trilogy the movies had some pretty big problems such as killing of the main villian by the end of the movie. I mean they introduced Green Goblin, let us know exactly who was under the mask from the beginning and then killed him at the end of the movie. I realize that GG died in the comics in a similar fashion, but we barely had any time to start to care about Spider-Man's greatest foe before he's dead. Take Nolan's Batman movies for instance, in Begins the story focuses on how Bruce Wayne becomes the Bat. Two villians are introduced, Ras Al Ghul and Scarecrow. Ras is introduced as Bruce's master/sensei and his "death" is kind of ambiguous, as we never see the body. Scarecrow is introduced early and is pretty much shown to be a minor villian and survives the movie. At the end of Begins, Batman's greatest foe is introduced, giving a lead in to the sequel. The Dark Knight large parts of the movie are devoted to the Joker, we get to see him in action without Batman showing up to foil is plans. Dark Knight shows us why Joker is such a threat and why he is a villian that couldn't have been beaten and thrown in jail against his will in the first 5 minutes of the movie.

My point being that the villians in the Spider-Man movies seem to be thrown into the movie because is needs a villian. Spidey-2 was a start in the right direction, but they killed off Doc Ock so there would be no chance of him at least becoming a minor character in a later film. Then Spidey-3 was just a mess with 3 villians, Spidey being corrupted by the symbiot, Parker's lady problems and a friend who can't figure out whether or not he wants to kill Spider-Man or give him a hug.

for the tl:dr folks, the Spider-Man trilogy sucked, they could have been better, and a reboot wouldn't hurt but still isn't really needed

[Mr.Smiley]

Its gonna be good to have a reboot. It just better be good.

[Mr.Smiley]

As a trilogy the movies had some pretty big problems such as killing of the main villian by the end of the movie. I mean they introduced Green Goblin, let us know exactly who was under the mask from the beginning and then killed him at the end of the movie. I realize that GG died in the comics in a similar fashion, but we barely had any time to start to care about Spider-Man's greatest foe before he's dead. Take Nolan's Batman movies for instance, in Begins the story focuses on how Bruce Wayne becomes the Bat. Two villians are introduced, Ras Al Ghul and Scarecrow. Ras is introduced as Bruce's master/sensei and his "death" is kind of ambiguous, as we never see the body. Scarecrow is introduced early and is pretty much shown to be a minor villian and survives the movie. At the end of Begins, Batman's greatest foe is introduced, giving a lead in to the sequel. The Dark Knight large parts of the movie are devoted to the Joker, we get to see him in action without Batman showing up to foil is plans. Dark Knight shows us why Joker is such a threat and why he is a villian that couldn't have been beaten and thrown in jail against his will in the first 5 minutes of the movie.

This is why I have always liked DC better than Marvel.

[ẈĀŦƧĦĪƧ₣Ā₵Ė]

I like thet there having a reboot. Hopfulley thell have the same movie company that does iron man do it so that spiderman can apear in the evengers movie.

[Green Skin]

I like thet there having a reboot. Hopfulley thell have the same movie company that does iron man do it so that spiderman can apear in the evengers movie.

That'd be awesome. I know some people hate SPiderman in the Avengers but I always liked it. Especially his banter with Luke Cage.

[BurningDoom]

They need to do a classic Avengers line-up for the movie. It needs to be the icons such as Iron Man, Thor, and Captain America so it makes a big impact on the general, non-comic reading public. Then a New Avengers line-up might work for a sequel.

-Nate-

[Top-notch comix]

They need to do a classic Avengers line-up for the movie. It needs to be the icons such as Iron Man, Thor, and Captain America so it makes a big impact on the general, non-comic reading public. Then a New Avengers line-up might work for a sequel.

-Nate-

but Fox has the rights to Spidey's movies, Marvel studios has the classic Avengers line-up

[whiskeytango]

All i can say is that I'm glad its not happening. After spiderman 3, I think its best to just move on. A reboot isn't going to take the first two great movies away from us, so I'm all for it.

[A Common Enemy]

I'd hate it if they did the green goblin again...give us rhino or vulture! Hell, even Electro!

[ẈĀŦƧĦĪƧ₣Ā₵Ė]

I'd hate it if they did the green goblin again...give us rhino or vulture! Hell, even Electro!

I hope they do Lizzerd!

[Green Skin]

They should just go over the top bad and do the Clone Saga

[BurningDoom]

They should just go over the top bad and do the Clone Saga

Laugh all you want, but Scarlet Spider would be awesome: